tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27610393.post6564653308452961750..comments2024-03-05T18:15:57.717-08:00Comments on The Good, The Bad, and The Unknown: The 11 Best Kings of Leon SongsJ. Paulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17990473289026908057noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27610393.post-78240011378450461562011-03-08T10:55:16.922-08:002011-03-08T10:55:16.922-08:00where is king of rodeo?where is king of rodeo?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05268926932379329163noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27610393.post-57506386403337935532008-09-16T10:30:00.000-07:002008-09-16T10:30:00.000-07:00Statistics and random polls are different creature...Statistics and random polls are different creatures. Take a look at all the different polls. many of them will have fairly similar results. Places like Rasmussen (run by an ultra conservative Christian) accurately predicted the outcome of the 04 election when all the other polls had Kerry winning. And Rassmusen tends to take the smallest portion of the public...around 1000.<BR/><BR/>But then acompleteunknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14728828762002675551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27610393.post-40352076077793200262008-09-15T23:52:00.000-07:002008-09-15T23:52:00.000-07:00Dude i usually love your rantings (Palin=wicked wi...Dude i usually love your rantings (Palin=wicked witch of the Klondike), but do you have any clue how polling actually works? This is not to say presidential polling is perfect (far from it). It usually is a meticulous art/science/guesscraft of predicting the composition of likely voters—not randomness.<BR/><BR/>That said, to steal from Mr. Twain (or whomever said it first): “There are 3 types of elizabethhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04956528995150167171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27610393.post-23584904658731814602008-09-15T17:18:00.000-07:002008-09-15T17:18:00.000-07:00No Ragoo what!?No Ragoo what!?TKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06099186850093609741noreply@blogger.com